Bush lawyers,
Sack the bastards!
The Bamfords are clearly right out of their minds.
Their heads are right done in, goddammit.
What's wrong with a bit of white-knuckle cricket?
Sack 'em all!
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-10-16/cricket-australia-investigates-decision-to-call-off-nsw-v-vic/9055302
For the picky, Law 6.2 comes into play here..."the umpires shall be the sole judges of the fitness of the pitch for play".
That's where the buck stops.
On the ground, that's that, but there's nothing preventing people who are not playing from disagreeing with or bagging the umpires before, during, and after a game.
Oh no siree, barrack yr life away.
Never mind Laws 2.7 and 2.8, which demand that it is "solely for the umpires together to decide" what Law 2.7.3 "it would not be sensible for play to proceed", means, under the circumstances.
It's up to the umps, the Bamfords, alone; no one else involved, no appealing under ideal circumstances, but the cheatin' thievin' refs were still surrounded by players, who were told in no uncertain terms it's none of their business.
The sacks of pineapples would have taken utes to distribute.
Oh, sorry, made that bit up, yr Honour.
And the season was on the line, for chrissake!
Lord, help us.
In the meantime "some kind of hatred is in order" it turns out.
http://www.cricket.com.au/news/david-warner-hatred-for-england-ashes-war-australia-verbal-aggression-cummins-starc/2017-10-15
What "kind" for some Poms, 'Burbs?
Sledging is a bit passé, so some Psych War, perhaps?
Maybe just ask Stokesy over after he's finished his anger management course, and see if we can't get him into a spiral of mental disintegration while he's hanging out for a drink.
Done it before.
Cruel game...cricket...just ask Clarkey...anyone remember August 2015?
BTW> Ferdinand has nothing to do with Magellan - merchant investment bankers - who've probs bought the Stupid Little Urn for a song.
